Autor: zenvampires

Veröffentlicht am

Yannick

Yannick

What is art?

The question is reminiscent of Walter Benjamin. But we are not going to deal with it. The question posed in the film Yannick is also reminiscent of the fundamental question of capitalism and the consumer. Because what does it mean to consume art? Or rather, what does it mean if I am not satisfied with the art offered to me?

Quentin Dupieux poses this question in his film Yannock. Or he asks many questions. But we won’t write about all of them.

Art • Mombasa • Kenya

What is art?

There are many ways to answer this question. But that’s not what we want to write about here. More interesting for us is that Dupieux’s movie reminds us of it. What is theater? There are people who march unsuspectingly through the European Biennial. Later, they post pictures of it on social media or send photos to their friends. And they are proud to have been at the Venice Biennale. Or the Documenta. But what did they see? What did they experience? Was it good? We never find out. The experience of art is to have been there. And to have experienced “art” or what someone understands it to be. 

What is the meaning of art?

Of course, we could think about what art wants to achieve. We could go back in time and take an anthropological approach. We could look at religious, social, and other meanings. And we could also think about the fact that Europeans, having discovered that you can make a lot of money with “art” (if we are not mistaken, this idea was born in Amsterdam, but perhaps much earlier, in one of the Roman villas). In the end, we may come to the conclusion that art, in its present form, should entertain. We as viewers, or rather consumers, should, well, consume art. In the end, we don’t care what ideas the artist had when creating the work. We are supposed to… be entertained. Surely there are other meanings of art in society. Especially in such a complicated society that calls itself European. There are still the political, religious and aesthetic aspects. But the consumer should consume. A good consumer is always good for the economy. 

The Movie

The movie would be told quickly. But what is Wikipedia for? Despite the rather boring description on Wikipedia, the movie touches on exactly these metaphysical problems. What happens to the viewer when the art shown to him does not meet his expectations? Is he now a consumer? Do they have “rights”? Like a consumer who can simply return the goods? Or have they simply not understood the demands of the creator? What happens if he disagrees with the work of art? What happens to a bad piece?
What is the point of art?
Dupieux does not give answers. He asks questions, in a rather short film. “Yannick. Just look for it in the cinemas near you. Or on the Internet. And think about the fact that you might not like the movie.

Veröffentlicht am

Il Mezzogiorno – il mio amore sporco Part II

Il Mezzogiorno – il mio amore sporco
Part II

We have already shown the first part of Piotr Millati’s phenomenal photos here. But there is more. And we didn’t want to withhold them.

Piotr Millati 1967
He lives in Sopot. By profession a literary historian working at the University of Gdansk. A photographer-traveler by avocation.
Favorite subject of photos – street scenes and landscapes.
Veröffentlicht am

Mechanical Metaphysics

Mechanical Metaphysics

Machines operate according to the laws of physics. Electronic music is also created according to the principles of physics. It is an electronic processes that we set in motion through programming. On the other hand, mathematics, which describes physics in its language, also belongs to metaphysics (at least according to Aristotle, but we don’t want to start a big philosophical discussion here). But if we think of mechanics as a man-made thing, then it belongs to metaphysics, just like music. And here is our answer to the philosophical dilemma.

0:00 / 0:00
Mechanical Metaphysics
Veröffentlicht am

Virtual Metaphysics III

Virtual Metaphysics vol. III

How about a bot that listens to music created by a bot? I don’t remember where I heard or read this sentence. I don’t even know if it’s true or false. All I know is that it has the power to redefine reality. Not the reality of war that we all think about. Not even the ethical questions we think about. What if AI not only creates music, texts, and images but also consumes them? What if one day AI produces a philosophy that is read and discussed by AI?

Hic sunt dracones

In his Metaphysics, Aristotle described the concept of the boundary as the ultimate, the last of something. Later, dragons were thought to be beyond the border. I don’t want to discuss now whether this has made it softer. Made it porous. Penetrated. Only much later did Derrida add the concept of difference. A border that is constantly shifting. The conquest of new territory. A concept of constant movement. Which perhaps brings us back to war. Where the war here is different from the one we think of. In which there may be something other than Dracones behind the border.

Metaphysics

What changes for metaphysics? Nothing at all. At first sight. I don’t want to propose the poetic theory that metaphysics is the area “behind” physics. In other words, to take a border between physics and metaphysics as a concept and then redefine it. This is about shifting boundaries within the concept of metaphysics. We have reported here that Imgarden describes human mental activity as metaphysics. Seen in this light, human beings constantly and incessantly produce metaphysics in the form of thought, politics, and history. At the time, we also asked what would happen if not only humans but also computers took over the production of thought, politics, and history.

The Robots

But maybe it’s not so bad. AI (here and here we have already written about this in another context) learns from us. They learn everything they find on the Internet (on computers). In this way, they collect the knowledge of humanity. And they give the knowledge of humanity back to us. And so they cannot (yet) cross the border. Now we can think about the concept of difference—the concept of the slow and steady shifting of the boundary. The question is what this idea brings us.
On the other hand, the “new” emerges from the known. From the composition of what is known. At this point, however, the bots still cannot feel water and do not know what grief is (they know but are not yet new beings). But as I said, I didn’t want to delve too deeply into the subject. I just wanted to present a thought experiment.

The Thoughts

So what happens when bots listen to music made by other bots? Nothing at first. Not much, at least. What happens when they have to decide which music to listen to? That brings up another question. A question that (we’re back to war, but maybe because that’s where development usually goes the fastest) people have only decided ethically. But what else happens?


There is a part of philosophy, experimental philosophy, that deals with things like “free will”. If machines were to make their own decisions, we would have to revisit that question. Then we would be getting closer to the question of “being”.


There is a second metaphysical question (perhaps we should abandon metaphysics and leave it entirely to the machines, because the field is quite complicated, as poststructuralism has already established). The question we have not yet asked is what is the instance of collected human knowledge to which the AI refers. Because humans like to create instances. Like the “swarm intelligence” that got us nowhere. Or Plato’s “third man”. Or the dragons.

The text was created by humans. But the images are not.

Veröffentlicht am

Boot It

Boot It

by Sopocki

We have already presented Sopocki’s music here. In his development, the artist works on the elaboration of a certain tension. Tension between the fast beat and slower elements. But it is too superficial to speak of tension. Because art is always about more than just that, it’s not about the technique of how tracks are created. It’s about the fact that we also feel something when we listen. And that these feelings are evoked in us.

Here you can find his new EP (external link):
https://soundcloud.com/300bpmboysclub/sets/boot-it-ep

Veröffentlicht am

Nonhuman Metyphysics

Nonhuman Metaphysics

1.

The experiment means that limits are explored. The limits of human action or the limits of what is possible. Perhaps also the limits of art. But limits do not necessarily mean setting out into something new. This is a modernist idea of the 19th century (perhaps some countries that are good at making diesel engines are afraid of technology, they still think they are in the 19th century). 

We are not concerned with limits at all. It’s about what experimentation might mean. It’s about exploring the new. And the joy of development. 

2.

It is not a new development that computers help people to produce music. Especially in electronic music, which is created entirely with the help of computers. Perhaps it is also nothing new that artificial intelligence helps in the production of music. The question that remains unanswered is always how deeply AI intervenes in the production process. If music is programmed, as in our case, the AI can create tracks. In our case, it was not. But the AI has already done a lot of work on some of the tracks. In this case, it has also become part of the Zenvampires Collective. 

3. 

Metaphysics has taken on different meanings over time. We will not discuss the term at this point. But if AI intervenes so deeply in the manufacturing process, it can also determine our metaphysics. It influences how we perceive music. It is still a metaphysics of metaphysics (AI learns from humans, it is the overall knowledge of humanity and therefore cannot be better than humans). The question is what happens when we enter the world of nonhuman metaphysics? Here is the first step. 

0:00 / 0:00
Nonhuman Metaphysics
Veröffentlicht am

Il Mezzogiorno – il mio amore sporco

Il Mezzogiorno – il mio amore sporco

There is some disturbing ambiguity in the fascination with which we are drawn to images depicting decay, ruin, and destruction. All the more so when they concern human life, set in and marked by such scenery. A similar consternation is caused by the fact that one of the constantly recurring themes of photography or painting is humanity crippled by the destructive passage of time, affected by some shameful frailty or repulsive ugliness. The photographer’s lens seeks their opposite pole as much as beauty and beauty.

I found this kind of photographic beauty in southern Italy.

For northern Italians, three-million-year-old Naples is the epitome of provincialism and disdainful exoticism. The plebeian temperament of the Neapolitans, their irritating dialect, poorly understood by Italians themselves, the pervasive chaos and disorder that are an integral part of life here, the incurable poverty and crime, are something completely foreign to residents of even the perfectly Europeanized Milan.

In yet another way, the quintessential periphery is Palermo, from which it is closer in a straight line to Tunis than to Rome. It is here, almost in the very center, that you will find La Kalsa – a slum neighborhood bombed during World War II and still not rebuilt, devoid of sanitation, which was marked on city plans as a white spot without streets or buildings.  

My photographs depict the people living there in their typical situations, in which both the dreariness and melancholy of their existence and its almost epic colorfulness are revealed.

Piotr Millati 1967
He lives in Sopot. By profession a literary historian working at the University of Gdansk. A photographer-traveler by avocation.
Favorite subject of photos – street scenes and landscapes.
Veröffentlicht am

Will Settles the Bill 

Will Settles the Bill

Text ©by Marek Gajdziński
Pic ©by Copilot

Will Settles the Bill

By dividing everything

What is and

What is not into

What is and

What is not,

We are like a fish that

Says to the other

In a scholarly voice:

“Now the aquarium,

Then beyond the aquarium,

And we have to come to terms with it”,

Hoping that these words

Will settle the bill.

Veröffentlicht am

Trzeci policjant, jaszczurka z ogona (4)

Trzeci policjant, jaszczurka z ogona (4)

Dzisiaj przedstawiamy czwartą i ostatnią część eseju Marka Gajdzińskiego pod tytułem “Trzeci policjant. jaszczurka z ogona”. Część trzecia dostępna jest tutaj. 

Text ©by Marek Gajdziński
Pics ©by DALL•E

4.

Patafizyczne z ducha są teorie de Selbiego oraz te głoszone przez nie mniej ekscentrycznych od niego dwóch policjantów, w towarzystwie których narrator spędza większość powieściowego czasu. Jedna z tych teorii dotyczy interakcji człowieka z rowerem. Każdy przedmiot i tak samo każda żywa istota składa się niezmierzonej liczby drgających, wirujących cząstek. Choćby taka owca, wypełniają ją “drobinki owczości”. Nie inaczej jest z człowiekiem czy rowerem. Kiedy człowiek wsiada na rower i jedzie, w miejscach stycznych, czyli tam, gdzie dłonie spotykają się z kierownicą, a tyłek z siodełkiem, dochodzi pod wpływem wstrząsów do nieustannej wymiany, cząstki rowerowości wchodzą w obszar człowieka, a cząstki człowieczeństwa przechodzą w obszar roweru. Im szybciej człowiek pedałuje, im bardziej wyboista i kręta droga, tym szybciej proces ów przebiega. Z czasem można zauważyć pewne cechy rowerowe w człowieku i odwrotnie, pewne cechy ludzkie w rowerze. W wyniku wymiany cząstek człowiek przestaje być wyłącznie człowiekiem, bo staje się w pewnym stopniu rowerem. Jeśli proces ten trwa odpowiednio długo, w końcu może dojść do całkowitej zamiany ról. A zatem kiedy widzimy człowieka niosącego na plecach rower, możemy być niemal pewni, że to w istocie człowiek, który całkowicie zmienił się w rower, jadący na rowerze, który całkowicie zmienił się w człowieka. Podobne wnioski możemy wysnuć, kiedy widzimy człowieka niosącego osła na barana. Albo konia. Ale nie oznacza to, że należy z tego powodu wystrzegać się jazdy na ośle czy rowerze. Bo zamiana ról jest oczywiście chwilowa. Podczas gdy człowiek niesie osła na barana, wymiana cząstek toczy się nieprzerwanie między osłem i ludzkimi placami czy karkiem, i po jakimś czasie wszystko wraca do normy. Ludzie na powrót stają się ludźmi, osły osłami, rowery rowerami. Czyli wszystko w zgodzie z tą znaną przypowieścią zen o górach, które znowu są górami, i rzekach, które są rzekami.

5.

Przeczytawszy Trzeciego policjanta można sobie zadać pytanie, na co nam właściwie ten cały de Selby? Dlaczego każdy rozdział niejako obowiązkowo zaczynać się musi jakimś nawiązaniem do twórczości Selbiego? Czasem wystarczy jedno słowo, które staje się pretekstem do umieszczenia kilkustronicowego przypisu. A przecież ta narracja mogłaby sobie doskonale dać bez niego radę. Tak, to prawda. Jednak wzmianki o de Selbym są ważne. Bo podkreślają serializm tej prozy.

Jak już powiedzieliśmy, powieść O’Briena to prawie gotowy serial filmowy. Ustaliliśmy nawet, jak by się każdy z odcinków zaczynał. Z przyjemnością napisalibyśmy też od razu, co w każdym odcinku byłoby dalej. Niestety, nie możemy tego uczynić. Bo mamy nadzieję, że tym tekstem zachęcimy tych, którzy nie mieli tego okazji jeszcze zrobić, do sięgnięcia po Trzeciego policjanta. A w tej powieści ważnym elementem jest zaskoczenie, które składa się na przyjemność czytania – najważniejszego dowiadujemy się na samym końcu. Odsłaniając za bardzo treść, moglibyśmy nowych wielbicieli prozy O’Briena tej przyjemności pozbawić. Na tym więc chwilowo poprzestańmy. Oraz na pewnej refleksji.

Tak jak nieoczywiste bywają korzyści wynikające z oglądania telewizyjnych seriali, tak zaskakujące mogą się wydać różne płynące z lektury takich powieści jak Trzeci policjant wnioski co do natury wózka, na którym wszyscy jedziemy. Choćby taka refleksja, że z całym naszym obecnym stanem wiedzy nie jesteśmy tak daleko, jak może byśmy chcieli, od absurdalnych teorii Selbiego. Wszak w ostatecznym rozrachunku, tak samo jak on, nie jesteśmy w stanie pewnych fundamentalnych zjawisk czy praw sensownie wyjaśnić. I tu, i tam, czy tego chcemy, czy nie, najważniejsze pytania kierują nas w stronę niepokalanej zasłony tajemnicy. A wszystko to dlatego, że przestrzeń i czas są iluzją, o czym coraz częściej zgodnym chórem śpiewają fizycy kwantowi. Co może niektórych widzów tego spektaklu, uzależnionych do poczucia realności świata rzeczywistego martwić, wręcz przerażać. Z drugiej jednak strony śpiew ten niesie niebagatelnej wagi pociechę. Jak powiada Selby, “skoro życie ludzkie jest omamem, […] człowiekowi rozsądnemu nie przystoi frasować się nadejściem największego omamu, jakim jest śmierć”.[1] Zwłaszcza że cokolwiek się dzieje – i tak się powtórzy.

[1] Flann O’Brien, Trzeci policjant, ZYSK i S-KA, 1996. Przekład: Małgorzata Grabowska i Andrzej Grabowski.

Veröffentlicht am

Hamburg Addis Mombasa

Hamburg Addis Ababa Mombasa

Three cities. Three places. And three different ontologies. But perhaps not far apart. Whereby the journey once led from Addis Ababa to New York City. But these were completely different experiences and completely different impressions. Yuki K. was inspired by ours. Have fun.

Pic ©by Zenvampires
Music ©by Yuki K.

0:00 / 0:00
Hamburg Addis Ababa Mombasa
Cookie Consent mit Real Cookie Banner